Plans for new groynes at Clacton and Holland have been exhibited and are available at TDC website. Will they work? Here are some reasons to think not.
You can see the planning application by going to
into the search box. Here you can download the exhibition poster
Here’s what is proposed
And here’s the plan
Now the first thing that comes to mind is there is somewhere in Tendring with rock groynes about 90 metre long and 90 metres apart, Seawick.
And just to be helpful there is a single case at Seawick where the groynes are about 180 metres apart and, as I’ve shown before(here and here), the beach where groynes are 180 metres apart is significantly more eroded. What’s more there is a little reef in the middle of the two groynes.
However the groynes at Seawick do not have the fishtails proposed for Clacton and Holland. Here’s the plan of proposed fish tails.
So they’re a sort of Y at the end of the groyne with one branch about 50 metres long and the other about 20.5 metres long.
There are already fishtails at Jaywick so, with the help of Google, let’s have a look at those.
It seems to me the groynes are about 600 metres apart and the longer of the fishtails is about 200 metres.
So here the groynes are between 2.4 and 3 times further apart than what is proposed at Clacton and Holland yet the longer of the fishtails is 4 times longer.
Now I am not an engineer, all I can do is look at what has been built and what is proposed and notice differences.
What do you think?
If use Google again to move slightly west we can see the groynes at Seawick (which are about 90 metres long) compared to one of the groynes at Jaywick. It is obvious the beaches are very different.
You can also see the beach between the two western most groynes is substantial worse than the the rest of the Seawick groynes, despite the little reef.
Remember 90 metre groynes are what is proposed for Clacton and Holland and some of the spacing will be more than 180 metres.
Perhaps the fishtails are the difference which will make THE difference, even though they are proportionately 60-75% smaller than at Jaywick.
There is another, different, reason for doubt. The building is supposed to take between 3 and 6 years. As Trevor Bright, a former project manager at BP, this is a huge difference.
It should be obvious having a builder round for twice as long is going to cost more. So how can project costs be controlled?